CO129-116 - Sir MacDonnell - 1866 [11-12] — Page 339

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

337

of the Board which he suggested,

tion which seems to have

suggestion

a

subsequently fallen through. At least

I can trace it no

the result of the Correspondence summed up by the Duke of Newcastle in his

further and I find

Despatch No 15 of 27 January 1864

CUD

the conditions on

-/64

Mr. B.

392

J.C.

longer required for

17403/13

R.

merely defining which land no Military purposes should revert to

the Colony. In fact a quotation from

the Iliad would have been as

to

any question

now under

apropos

discussion

as

Moody's letter.

8.

CL

reference to Colonel

I fail equally to gain any information from Colonel Lovell's

Entrand in

note of last July

addressed to the

Surveyor General and referred to by

Colonel Lovell

cus

proving the Surveyor

General's knowledge of the present

Getter puber

firmat 721 Der 766

plans of the Military. I enclose that

note in Original the better to enable

Your Lordship to judge how far it

supports such an

assertion. It is a private note, which never would have been written at all but for the

accidental circumstance of the Surveyor

General wanting

some earth then

lying

on War Department ground.

It

gives

no reason to

suppose that

any

plan

was

then

much

less

designed

matured for pushing forward the

frontage of ground not War Department

Edit History

2026-05-19 12:38:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
337 of the Board which he suggested, tion which seems to have suggestion a subsequently fallen through. At least I can trace it no the result of the Correspondence summed up by the Duke of Newcastle in his further and I find Despatch No 15 of 27 January 1864 CUD the conditions on -/64 Mr. B. 392 J.C. longer required for 17403/13 R. merely defining which land no Military purposes should revert to the Colony. In fact a quotation from the Iliad would have been as to any question now under apropos discussion as Moody's letter. 8. CL reference to Colonel I fail equally to gain any information from Colonel Lovell's Entrand in note of last July addressed to the Surveyor General and referred to by Colonel Lovell cus proving the Surveyor General's knowledge of the present Getter puber firmat 721 Der 766 plans of the Military. I enclose that note in Original the better to enable Your Lordship to judge how far it supports such an assertion. It is a private note, which never would have been written at all but for the accidental circumstance of the Surveyor General wanting some earth then lying on War Department ground. It gives no reason to suppose that any plan was then much less designed matured for pushing forward the frontage of ground not War Department
Baseline (Original)
337 of the Board which he suggested, tion which seems to have suggestion a subsequently fallen through. At least I can trace it no the result of the Correspondence summed up by the Duke of Newcastle in his further and I find Despatch No 15 of 27* January 1864 CUD the conditions on -/64 Mr. B. 392 J.C. longer required for 17403/13 R. ьвові merely defining which land no Military purposes should revert to the Colony. In fact a quotation from the Iliad would have been as to any question now under apropos discussion as · Moody's letter. 8. CL reference to bolonel I fail equally to gain any information from bolonel Lovell's Entrand in note of last July addressed to the Surveyor General and referred to by bolonel Sovell cus proving the Surveyor General's knowledge of the present Getter puber firmat 721 Der 766 plans of the Military. I enclose that note in Original the better to enable Your Sordship to judge how far it supports such an assertion. It is a private note, which never would have been written at all but for the accidental circumstance of the Surveyor General wanting some earth then lying on War Department ground. It gives no reason to suppose that any plan was then much less designed matured for pushing forward the frontage of ground not War Department
2026-05-19 12:38:02 · Baseline
View content

337

of the Board which he suggested,

tion which seems to have

suggestion

a

subsequently fallen through. At least

I can trace it no

the result of the Correspondence summed up by the Duke of Newcastle in his

further and I find

Despatch No 15 of 27* January 1864

CUD

the conditions on

-/64

Mr. B.

392

J.C.

longer required for

17403/13

R.

ьвові

merely defining which land no Military purposes should revert to

the Colony. In fact a quotation from

the Iliad would have been as

to

any question

now under

apropos

discussion

as

· Moody's letter.

8.

CL

reference to bolonel

I fail equally to gain any information from bolonel Lovell's

Entrand in

note of last July

addressed to the

Surveyor General and referred to by

bolonel Sovell

cus

proving the Surveyor

General's knowledge of the present

Getter puber

firmat 721 Der 766

plans of the Military. I enclose that

note in Original the better to enable

Your Sordship to judge how far it

supports such an

assertion. It is a private note, which never would have been written at all but for the

accidental circumstance of the Surveyor

General wanting

some earth then

lying

on War Department ground.

It

gives

no reason to

suppose that

any

plan

was

then

much

less

designed

matured for pushing forward the

frontage of ground not War Department

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.